Monday, November 17, 2008

Max: On Souls

Recently, in an unfriendly religious discussion—topic: abortion; but is there any more religious topic than infant murder? I think not, I’ve read about the plagues of Egypt and the sacrifice of Isaac—I was asked whether or not I believe if I have a soul. My answer was a resounding, yes. My counter-question was, “Do animals have souls?” Not surprisingly, the answer was, absolutely not. It’s no secret that evangelicals beat their pets more than Catholics and atheists combined. I have that statistic lying around here somewhere.

This discussion made me wonder if all humans have souls. My conclusion is, no. Children with the inability to deny God don’t have souls…

…and midgets don’t have souls.

Don’t let the moniker “Little People” blind you to reality. Real people are the only ones with souls, and to quote Butch: “that ain’t no people.”

J. R. R. Tolkien knew that anyone under four and half feet was not human; he called them Hobbits. L. Frank Baum’s political satire The Wizard of Oz segregates these soulless animals to Munchkinland. Do I even need to mention Oompa Loompas? I don’t see souls in those pseudo-humanoids. Agent Orange, there on the left, wants to dip your child in chocolate, roll him to the back room and eat his brain. Scary.

I think George W. Bush was correct when he said, “If it looks like a lame duck, and quacks like a lame duck, it’s a lame duck.” “Butch?” “That ain’t no duck!”

P. T. Barnum, the father of the rollercoaster, intentionally gave us an unsuspecting way to check whether or not someone has a soul. “You have to be this tall to ride this souls-only ride.”

Don’t get me wrong. I think that there’s a place for everything. I just want to put everything in its place.

Leonardo da Vinci said that “form follows function.” With the insight of da Vinci, we need to take that soulless midget form and put it to its real function: party roving sombrero salsa platter.

But that’s just my two chips.

4 comments:

Dusty said...

This would be the time to point out that the views of Max Vega do not necessarily reflect the views of all of us. So, Little People, please direct your hate mail to him alone.

Thanks.

Dusty said...

One of the justifications for abortion is that "it doesn't have a soul yet." If an animal, or a midget, also doesn't have a soul, does that necessarily mean they can be killed without violation a higher moral law (should such a higher moral law exist)? Where does one draw that line?

Garrett F. Baker said...

Scott Butcher and I solved this problem a few years ago by creating a unit for souls, the scoga. A human soul is rated at 1 scoga, which is the highest rating possible. Plants and rocks are rated at 0 scogas. The most lifeless of animals, coral, anemones, so on, would rate at like .05. The best animals, dogs, have around .9 scogas. Primates are just under that. And so it goes for the whole animal kingdom. (Mosquitos rate the lowest at .00000001 scogas.)

Max Vega said...

Since souls are only relevant as a religious term, I would gather from the "scoga" that 9/10ths of a cat goes to heaven, and 1/10th goes somewhere else.

No way. All or none.